Ebbets is coming - the real deal!

[mcoll]

i half to argee with a lot of what been said, but as i went back throw the list of claasics, and had a thought of why they did what they did. think in terms about it this way. they made uniforms for the clubs across a lot different time periods from now of course all the way back to the early 1900s. i'm thinking they did the samething for the part with the stadiums and not simply becuse it was the easy way to do this. for them create a new park if they hadnt done it before woulnd't be that big of a deal. we now have ebbets thanks to this mod and it takes us as long or longer to do this, since we dont have the resource team and stuff to do this, in one simple place, so i think that way it goes the way it does. they could have done better, but this is one reason they have done it that way, the other maybe they couldnt get or arent allowed to create it do the licance agreement with mlb. the one park the makes no since even more so than the others is the P.R. park the expos where forced to use for two years before washington. there no logic there in any way.

what i would have done without knowing what mlb limits are upon ea is stick with the term "Classic" as it meant to be. i'd dump P.R. (bad spelling) hibim and the big o in montreal, the vet, municpal staduim in clev. then cinergy in cin., qulcomm in sd, leave, shibe, forbrs, crossly, the polo grounds, the astrodome (as its was the first indoor park only reason), fenway, and tiger stad., then the ones that can go either way depending on what other parks could fill the spots or minor league parks might be possible. the met which is the old twins park and the others menteion before in 1st parg., giffteth which is the old senatros place, and sportemn park, but both these last 3 are vary debateable.

just a contiuned thought.

[Kriegz]

i half to argeee with a lot what been said, but i wnet back throw the list of claasics, and had a tought of why they did what they did.thikn about it this way. they hmade unifroms for the clubs acrss a lot differnt time periods from now of course all the way back to the early 1900s. i'm thinking they dind the same thing for the part with the stadiums and not simply becue it was the eastest way to do this. for them crate a new park if they hadnt done it before woulnd't be that big of a deal. we now have ebbets thanks to this mod and takes us as long or longer to do this, since we dont have the recoruce team and stuff to this, in one simple place, so i think that way it goes the way it does. they could have done better, but thius one reason they haved done it that way, the other maybe they couldnt get or arent allowed to crate it do the licance agreement with mlb. the one park the makes no since even more so than the others is the portaco park the expos wher forced to use for two years before washington. there no logic there.in any way.

what i would have done without knowing what mlb limits are upon ea is stick with the term "Classic" as it meant to be. i'd dump hibim and he big o in montreal, the vet, municpal staduim in clev. then cinergy in cin. possibly, qulcomm in sd, leave, shibe, forbrs, crossly, the polo grounds, the astrodome as its was the first indoor park only reason, fenway, and tiger stad., then the ones that can go either way depending are what other parks could fill the spots or minor parks might be pssoble. the met which the told twins park and the others menteion before in 1st parg., giffteth whichthe old senatros place, and sportemn park, but both these last two are vary debateable.

just a contiuned thoought.

That was hard to read

[mcoll]

tribe and anyone if your having problems reading my stuff i'm sorry, but i do the best i can when i write stuff. when i have a lot to to say or there are lots of parts to it like the last post of mine to this thread, sometimes it get hard to write.

the mind goes faster than i can write on long subjects.

just do the best you can, i still think i get my point out.

[Padres67]

Looks great but I tried to replace the one that Fuzz did with the total classics and I lost ebbets and have shibe with clouds in right field and no more wall.

[danc]

maybe fuzz could replace his older ebbets with this newer/nicer

version???

That would make it show up as Ebbets and be much easier to

select without having to replace Shibe, which I play in all the time!