extravaboy Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 What original player ratings for Atlanta players do you consider wrong? For example, it seems like Langerhans has a pretty low speed rating. And Betemit is useless with the bat. Thought it would be interesting to hear what other think about the ATL players ratings in the game. Which is too high, too low? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleMo Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 chippers ratings in the game need to be upped from the 60s to the 80s. betemit, from the 60s to the low to mid 70s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spivey11 Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 Also, I think the Giles' ratings need to be upped a bit, the game has him in the 70s against right handers. And I know that's not true. Also, Pete Orr's speed needs to be upped more. He's nearly as fast as Furcal. And Chipper's fielding need to be a little better than it is, in the game they have him as a horrible fielder - but he is actually a pretty good fielder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stix Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 I put Langy's ratings about equal but a little under Kelly's ratings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleMo Posted June 22, 2005 Share Posted June 22, 2005 i traded those bum rookies anyway. sorry. that fat kid is hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extravaboy Posted June 23, 2005 Author Share Posted June 23, 2005 What about Kelly Johnson and Andruw Jones? suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spivey11 Posted June 23, 2005 Share Posted June 23, 2005 I think that Andruw is pretty good right where he is, maybe boost his power up a little - but that would be all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.