jhath Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 yea, clinton sucked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleMo Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 That was Lewinsky. Not Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhath Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 my bad clinton was the best politician we had had in a while... too bad he ruined it because he couldnt keep his pants on.... lewinsky was his 3rd affair actually.... look at the welfare reform tho... republican controlled congress passed welfare refrom that democrats hated.... when it went to pass, clinton was smart and signed it... then took all the credit and hes remembered for welfare that he originally protested Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kccitystar Posted July 25, 2006 Author Share Posted July 25, 2006 What exactly did oral sex have to do with the President doing his job? To this very day I do not know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdub Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 It could be anything from spotlights, to reflections. I don't think helecopters are going to fire missles into a building without people noticing. I don't think missles would bring down the building, besides we all know those choppers don't come equipped with missles. Your probably right about the spotlights. The rescue choppers were ordered away because of the danger from the fire and smoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Applejak Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Let me pose this question - If the rest of the world has disapproved of Israel's attacks on Hezbollah, but Bush has supported the decision, do you believe or trust anything that this government churns out? Until Bush leaves the oval office, other countries will continue to laugh and look on with amazement at our "world leader" Mr. Bush. Dont beleive that. Israel actually has a lot of support for its attacks this time. Usually they are presumed guilty until prooved innocent, but this time most of the free world acknowledges their right to defend itself. People are quick to attack Bush becasue he didnt get a UN resolution to invade Iraq, so why are they silent now that the UN has just said it is a difficult situation, and not called for any action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhath Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 well, i know i would feel protected and secure if i knew the support of the un was behind me..... (sarcasm....) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jogar84 Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Heres a conspiracy for you: Kofi Anna accuses Israel of intentionally targeting UN peacekeeping posts. http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2006/07/..._annan_lash.php Man, i think i need to just turn off the news for a while because this is getting really depressing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigersfan05 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 http://www.maddox.xmission.com/c.cgi?u=911_morons Maddux ways in. ------------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jp_hidalgo Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 I don't know if there's conspiracy or what. But I am sure about easy-to-understand ideas, ie: create a war against a country just because some crazy men from there are terrorist is really unfair. I mean... Afghanistan, Irak, Libano and Middle West are not the devil... the people living there don't deserve to die (I think nobody deserves it). And... like Michael Moore said: Where are all those famous chemical weapons??? We don't forgot that. Peace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.