ishotlove Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 I'm redoing/updating my rosters and was wondering if someone could tell me how the ratings compare to the attributes in the game. What i mean is, generally, what would a contact rating of 95 give u? .320, .330, etc... . i'm just looking for a rough comparison of ratings-attributes. I know there are excel sheets and stuff that do all the converting for u but i'd rather just do it myself. 90's = ??? 80's = ??? 70's = ??? 60's = ??? 50's = ??? ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Unit Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 Fanfare Games has a rating like this somewhere on their site. I saw it a while back and it made a lot of sense. Don't remember the whole thing though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klesko174 Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 basically anywhere in the high 80's or low to mid 90's is gonna give you above .300 usually, do this for guys like freddy sanchez, joe mauer, jose lopez, ichiro is gonna have a little higher cuz he gets alot more hits. 80's will be guys like about .300 like eckstein, david wright and Jose Reyes. now sexson would be lower cuz he strikes out a lot (60's) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stecropper Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 Rougly based on how MVPEdit associates ratings: Contact: 90-100 310-340&> 80-89 300-309 70-79 280-298 60-69 260-278 50-59 240-258 40-49 220-238 30-39 200-218 00-29 below 200 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishotlove Posted August 5, 2006 Author Share Posted August 5, 2006 thanks DUnit, "highlight-reel" over at Fanfare Games has an excellent tutorial and explanation of how he rates players. anybody else who was looking for the same thing, here it is... http://www.fanfaregames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2676 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.