drbeep97 Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 the cowboys are wayyyy over hyped... i'm very happy they lost and i'm an eagles fan... eagles'll win on sunday... the defense has stepped up, garcia is playing well, and we're at home. it's over baby and the pats are gonna win tomorrow too... "The Real Drew Bledsoe's" thoughts on the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mvp23 Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 It`s funny that no one is thinking that the bears will go to the superbowl. My prediction, Ravens vs. Bears in the superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbeep97 Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 the bears don't have a good offense and played a weak schedule so they're a soft 13-3 or w/e they are. the saints, eagles, or seattle (probably seattle) will knock them off like that other year they were 13-3 and lost in their first game to the eagles (i think it was '03) and that team is alot like this years team. eagles V. seahawks NFC championship chargers V. patriots AFC championship chargers v. eagles superbowl chargers win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgbaseball Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I really can't see the Bears winning their game next week. Grossman probably has no confidence in himself or from the team after his absolutely pitiful performance against the Packers last week. Their defense hasn't been playing well either, so I think they'll lose their game. That being said, I like a Saints/Chargers SB, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav3rek Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 Bears has 0 chance of winning the Super Bowl. They will be lucky to even win 1 game in the playoffs. They are the definition of "over-hyped" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oxbay Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I do think however Dallas should look elsewhere for a QB because Romo just can't seem to get that job done consistently. Take today's game for example: he simply CHOKED. Whoa... Before you start saying Romo can't get the job done, you have to take into account his experience. He started 10 games this season and fared pretty well. Come to think of it, I think Romo's individual stats are better than Tom Brady's in 2001 (his first real season) - only difference is that the Pats went 11-5 (due to be better support staff?). Yet, if the Pats lost a few more games, I'm sure the blame wouldn't have been put on Brady himself. In addition, while Romo's play did decline towards the end of the season, I would lay most of the Cowboys' faults on the defense, not Romo. They said during today's game that the Defense in the last 4 games allowed 400+ yds of offense, 30+ points per game (or something similar to this). Again, this is just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbeep97 Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 the reason romo is getting alot of blame is because he made the pro bowl... so he "should" be able to win his team games no... he shouldn't be getting all the blame but one reason he is, is the fact that he made the pro bowl and he's not a rookie or a 2nd year player (and how the media made him out to be the "best thing since sliced bread" probably didn't help him much either) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav3rek Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 Whoa... Before you start saying Romo can't get the job done, you have to take into account his experience. He started 10 games this season and fared pretty well. Come to think of it, I think Romo's individual stats are better than Tom Brady's in 2001 (his first real season) - only difference is that the Pats went 11-5 (due to be better support staff?). Yet, if the Pats lost a few more games, I'm sure the blame wouldn't have been put on Brady himself. In addition, while Romo's play did decline towards the end of the season, I would lay most of the Cowboys' faults on the defense, not Romo. They said during today's game that the Defense in the last 4 games allowed 400+ yds of offense, 30+ points per game (or something similar to this). Again, this is just my opinion. I'd have to agree. Romo didn't turn the ball over at all in this game. He worked with what he was given. The only real bad play he made was fumbling the field goal, he managed the game well. If Terry Glen doesn't fumble, or if Roy Williams could actually cover someone on a go route, or if after Romo's fumble if the defense had remembered to run on the field instead of letting Alexander run for 20 yards, we wouldn't even be discussing this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaptorQuiz Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 Bears has 0 chance of winning the Super Bowl. They will be lucky to even win 1 game in the playoffs. They are the definition of "over-hyped" Zero chance, eh? Well I guess there's no need to actually have the teams suit up and play then. lol. I like the Bears, even tho I'm from STL, but if anything is going to cost them a decent run thru the playoffs, it's going to be their black hole at quarterback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav3rek Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 Zero chance, eh? Well I guess there's no need to actually have the teams suit up and play then. true, they probably shouldn't even bother suiting up. they're going to lose. it would just make things quicker, and have less heartbreak for the fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
felmlyd Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 id just like to say that Tony Romo Sucks large testicals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronmexico Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 true, they probably shouldn't even bother suiting up. they're going to lose. it would just make things quicker, and have less heartbreak for the fans. He's right, they got the #1 seed by a roll of the dice, that's what happened, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I don't know... the Bears have a pretty talented D... Grossman doesn't have to do much to get a victory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oxbay Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 the reason romo is getting alot of blame is because he made the pro bowl... so he "should" be able to win his team games no... he shouldn't be getting all the blame but one reason he is, is the fact that he made the pro bowl and he's not a rookie or a 2nd year player (and how the media made him out to be the "best thing since sliced bread" probably didn't help him much either) Let's not even get started on the Pro Bowls and All Star Games (they are such BS). In addition, if that is the reason he is getting the blame, I would consider rethinking your evaluation of him. Look how many players make the Pro Bowl and miss the playoffs - but in your evaluation, they should all be winners, correct? I just think it is more of a "I hate the Cowboys and therefore I'm going to bash any player possible" type of mentality for most people. In regards to the Bears and their chance of winning the Super Bowl - remember that the Ravens won the Super Bowl in 2001 and they weren't an "offensive" driven team. Same thing can be said about the Tampa Bay team that won in 2003 against Oakland. So maybe the Bears can do it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DustinTheWin Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 if the pats dont beat the jets im gonnna go crazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted January 7, 2007 Author Share Posted January 7, 2007 id just like to say that Tony Romo Sucks large testicals Make that the last time you ever give such a graphical description in here again. And no, I'm not defending the Cowboys nor am I a Cowboy fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav3rek Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 He's right, they got the #1 seed by a roll of the dice, that's what happened, right? pfff...please.... they got the #1 seed in the NFC. The NFC is by far the weaker conference, the talent in the NFC is almost non existent. The Bears has the easiest schedule in the NFL this year, and they took advantage of it. Which I must give them credit for, the did beat a bunch of push overs. They seem to take advantage of thier schedules in the regular season, but when they get into the playoffs they blow it, big time. Home field advantage? Please the Bears have none, they'd be better off playing on the road. No one is intimidated to go into their house in January and play them, they have no mystique. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronmexico Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 if the jets dont beat the pats im gonnna go crazy Me too ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DustinTheWin Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 Me too dont be switching around what i said!! i hate the jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheff Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 My predictions Eagles / Saints - NFC Championship Patroits / Chargers - AFC Championship Eagles / Chargers - Super Bowl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drbeep97 Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 sheff... eagles and saints can't play eachother in the NFC championship (if the eagles win they play each other next week in NO)... but i still like your predictin (GO EAGLES!) and oxbay... i'm not saying that all pro bowlers are winners... but look at when a pro bowlers team looses a big game... who normally gets the blame? ...the one thing that the bears have that the ravens and buccs didn't have was a liability at QB... but who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oxbay Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 and oxbay... i'm not saying that all pro bowlers are winners... but look at when a pro bowlers team looses a big game... who normally gets the blame? I agree that he is at fault [partially] for the loss. ...the one thing that the bears have that the ravens and buccs didn't have was a liability at QB... but who knows? I guess this would depend on a personal definition of liability. Ravens had Dilfer and the Bucs had Brad Johnson - Liability??? Regardless of what you look at on the offensive side of the ball, the defense of the Ravens and Bucs carried them to the Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mvp23 Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I am not sure if the bears will win the superbowl but I think they will get there. The R.Grossman can step up when he has to and they have enough offense and plenty of deffense to keep the score close. If the gorssman does not turn the ball over and Jones gets 4 to 5 yards per carry bears should be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mav3rek Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I am not sure if the bears will win the superbowl but I think they will get there. The R.Grossman can step up when he has to and they have enough offense and plenty of deffense to keep the score close. If the gorssman does not turn the ball over and Jones gets 4 to 5 yards per carry bears should be good. you could say that about any team in the world. if the raiders qb's didnt turn the ball over than their running backs got 4 to 5 yards per carry, they'd be undefeated!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oxbay Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I'm not so sure about that Mav3rek, it is the Raiders you are talking about . . . LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.