seanzarelli Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 0K2OSOZnhqc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SESbb30 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 holy ******* ****! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkB Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 I'm not even a football fan (actually, I pretty much detest it), but that is one fly-*** play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RdSoxFan618 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Great heads up play! That kid has a very high Football IQ. You just cannot teach that. Anybody see Leon Washington's heads up play vs. the Bills on Sunday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pujols Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 is that even legal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xiberger Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Wow! He's not just playing hard, he's playing smart. :wtg: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeveredSoulX Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 That is very legal - the guy was not out of bounds (his feet were still in the air) and that was a backwards lateral and thus - a TD, now would the touchdown throw go to the QB or the TE haha - too bad they don't have an assists column in football ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanzarelli Posted November 5, 2008 Author Share Posted November 5, 2008 something tells me based on the positioning of the two players, that this is how the play was supposed to be ran Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RdSoxFan618 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 That is very legal - the guy was not out of bounds (his feet were still in the air) and that was a backwards lateral and thus - a TD, now would the touchdown throw go to the QB or the TE haha - too bad they don't have an assists column in football Actually, that was not a lateral. It was a reception by the guy who got the TD. The guy who "passed" it back to him was simply a "deflection". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeveredSoulX Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Actually, that was not a lateral. It was a reception by the guy who got the TD. The guy who "passed" it back to him was simply a "deflection". The TE had possession of the ball in his hands if you freeze at 0:25, it's a little blurry but in HD you can see the ball in his hands, but he threw it back into play to the WR - so it was a deflection/lateral, but still a sweet-a s s play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RdSoxFan618 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 The TE had possession of the ball in his hands if you freeze at 0:25, it's a little blurry but in HD you can see the ball in his hands, but he threw it back into play to the WR - so it was a deflection/lateral, but still a sweet-a s s play But did he get a foot in bounds to qualify it as a catch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeveredSoulX Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 No he caught the pass but just flicked it back out to the WR, the TE had possession, but he never was going to be in bounds, but a mid-air catch can still be called a catch, just not using the "correct terminology" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RdSoxFan618 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 No he caught the pass but just flicked it back out to the WR, the TE had possession, but he never was going to be in bounds, but a mid-air catch can still be called a catch, just not using the "correct terminology" Right, and I'm talking about the correct terminology, that's what I have been talking about. He did catch it, but it will not go down in the stat book as a catch and lateral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeuceBlades Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Hey Chris, dont you know that Glasner feeding me the rebound?? lol 13 to 22 for 6 baby!!! The pass was never completed to 13, because 13 never had control of it. The deflection was caught by 22 (which is a great number I might add) for the TD. So to make a long story short, the QB gets credit for the TD pass to number 22, via 13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.