NYM Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 There should be rankings on the website...for instance if u have 0-100 rookie 101-300- All-Star 301-500- MVP 501-700- Veteran 700+ - Legend u thinkl u can be able to do that?? PLEASE SUBMIT VOTE!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megabigd Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYM Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 good idea yea i know :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trues Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 It was decided when we first started this site not to have rankings. We even had a poll. We're currently revisiting the idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYM Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 It was decided when we first started this site not to have rankings. We even had a poll. We're currently revisiting the idea. please consider it......i think it would be a great idea. i even put a poll up in here to see what the people want. i hope we can also do somthin like what i said, with rookie all star mvp etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCHC165 Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 i have a suggestion to make. 200 posts is too early. U can easily get 100 so im thinking going up the levels by at least 300+... ideas???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYM Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 yea anythings fine.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerryW Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 I really like this idea...It distinguishes those who have contributed to this forum for extensive periods of time from those who simply sign up to answer single questions and then leave...Plus, having your own such "badge" is a nice reward for those who frequently post on and contribute to the forum and the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetsGoOakland Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 My forum does that. Minor League prospect (0-50) Rookie (51-100) All-Star (101-250) Most Valuable Player (251-450) Hall of Famer (451+) Sign up and start posting (it needs it). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpup Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 bad idea. i vote no. number of posts means nothing. The only way to do it fair would be to do it like OS did in the past and let users rate each post. A post describing how to mod a stadium to help someone should not carry the same weight as a post saying "i agree" etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYM Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 true about that....but still i think we should have it....its cool! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 My forum does that. Minor League prospect (0-50) Rookie (51-100) All-Star (101-250) Most Valuable Player (251-450) Hall of Famer (451+) Sign up and start posting (it needs it). you gotta up the levels. 451 is accessable in a weekend for some people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYM Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 you gotta up the levels. 451 is accessable in a weekend for some people. i know....those shouldnt be the reael standings...its juts to make an example of how it should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 i think for this site and Oakland's both, this should be the rank system. it's a little off kilter and unsequenced, but more likely. 0-250 rookie 251-550- All-Star 551-900- MVP 901-1999 - Legend 2000+ - Grandfathered. the last one is funny. for my own amusement, but if not than this should suffice ... 0-250 rookie 251-550- All-Star 551-900- MVP 901+ - Legend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYM Posted January 4, 2005 Author Share Posted January 4, 2005 taht would mean im still a lonley all star but that is good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted January 4, 2005 Share Posted January 4, 2005 taht would mean im still a lonley all star but that is good! well, all star is nothing to frown about, i don't think ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 There should be rankings on the website...for instance if u have 0-100 rookie 101-300- All-Star 301-500- MVP 501-700- Veteran 700+ - Legend u thinkl u can be able to do that?? PLEASE SUBMIT VOTE!! Good idea NYM!!! And if we get this thing rolling, I'm putting you in T-Ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Good idea NYM!!! And if we get this thing rolling, I'm putting you in T-Ball. LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO!!! lmaoooo, soda out the nose again! LMAO! ... sorry, that killed me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubsfaninfla Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 This seems liek a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 :lol: This NYM guy is funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KPrelesnik Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 soda out the nose burns mvp soon baba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 aaaah, now that i'm all cleaned up ... lmao. i feel bad for NYM though .. first The Big Mod Book joke he bought, now the T-Ball joke. i know it's all in good intentions but still ... he's such a newb! lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carter Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Tell me something, what do the rankings imply if they are based on the number of posts? There is no added value of having the title of "Legend" when we all can already see who posts a lot and who doesn't. In my opinion the ranking system should award people for making quality posts that are of some value to the MVPmods community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 Tell me something, what do the rankings imply if they are based on the number of posts? There is no added value of having the title of "Legend" when we all can already see who posts a lot and who doesn't. In my opinion the ranking system should award people for making quality posts that are of some value to the MVPmods community. now who is to decide which posts are generated as "quality" and which are garbage? that's MY question ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhath Posted January 5, 2005 Share Posted January 5, 2005 instead of factoring soley on posts.... why not factor the amount of time one has been on the forum and the # of the posts? that would reward consistent members rather than ones who in one month post 400 times and dont contribute any worthwhile messages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.