capa Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 I think I'm gonna do the padres after I'm done the 91 Twins. There's still room, right capa? I think with the 70 Reds we are at 27, so 4 more teams are doable..yes...98 Padres can get in...let me update the list... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capa Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 Ok..latest update - 27 teams: 50 phils 62 giants 64 cards 70 reds 71 pirates 74 white sox 75 boston 76 tigers 77 nyy 77 LA 79 pirates 80 braves 83 white sox 83 orioles 84 sd 89 sf 89 cubs 90 a's 91 Pirates 91 twins 93 braves 93 phillies 95 rockies 96 Rangers 97 marlins 98 padres 99 indians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewgrass Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 sweet, like my new avatar!! <------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewgrass Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 you forgot the 64 Phillies. Who's working on that one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capa Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 sweet, like my new avatar!! <------- Funny...hey...the guy made it to the show in the 60's when there were only half the teams there are now...you gotta respect that on every level... C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capa Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 you forgot the 64 Phillies. Who's working on that one? There is a post higher up where someone said they were doing them...let me look... It is Stecropper (Don)...he has it covered... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewgrass Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 Funny...hey...the guy made it to the show in the 60's when there were only half the teams there are now...you gotta respect that on every level... C I wish he got a chance to play more, but he had a tough time hitting, probably cause he neer got the chance to play every day. But he was a helluva catcher! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capa Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 I wish he got a chance to play more, but he had a tough time hitting, probably cause he neer got the chance to play every day. But he was a helluva catcher! Yeah...anyone who can catch a Gibson fastball and slider has to have quick, soft hands... C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capa Posted May 23, 2005 Share Posted May 23, 2005 Just so it doesn't get lost on the previous page: Ok..latest update - 27 teams: 50 phils 62 giants 64 cards 70 reds 71 pirates 74 white sox 75 boston 76 tigers 77 nyy 77 LA 79 pirates 80 braves 83 white sox 83 orioles 84 sd 89 sf 89 cubs 90 a's 91 Pirates 91 twins 93 braves 93 phillies 95 rockies 96 Rangers 97 marlins 98 padres 99 indians C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danc Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Thanks capa/fuzz, I am just not familiar enough with mvpedit etc. to make it worth my time to do the realignment (eather based on time period, or franchise) on my own. With the logistics of renaming and uniform/photo realigning I can see why it is not a priority with you guys. I am suprised that it is not a priority within the community. Dynasty is the only way to play this game IMHO. Playing the 27 yanks against the seattle pilots does not make for a very exciting division race. I really want to thank you guys for all your hard work and I do enjoy playing with these classic teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexTony Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 the '64 phils are done, compliments of stecropper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capa Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 the '64 phils are done, compliments of stecropper Up to 28 now... 50 phils 62 giants 64 cards 64 phils 70 reds 71 pirates 74 white sox 75 boston 76 tigers 77 nyy 77 LA 79 pirates 80 braves 83 white sox 83 orioles 84 sd 89 sf 89 cubs 90 a's 91 Pirates 91 twins 93 braves 93 phillies 95 rockies 96 Rangers 97 marlins 98 padres 99 indians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MetsDrummer Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Those Indians and Rangers teams had some stacked offenses, I can't wait to use them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padres67 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Thanks for including the 64 Phils and the 70 Reds-the reds were awesome that year but ran into a guy named Brooks-his glove and bat beat them. The Phils were mismanaged down the stretch-Mauch used two pitchers basically and screwed his team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewgrass Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Sweeeet, 3 more Phillies teams! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnofsteel34 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 basically what is Total Classics 2005 ...old clasic teams from past Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stecropper Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 mnofsteel34, That is exactly what Total Classics 2005 is along with Oldtime Logos, Uniforms, Stadiums etc etc etc ------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Y4L - That's exactly correct. That's the way I have it setup right now and it works great. Ok, a little update on this thing. I did this last night and it works perfect. In one directory I have the minor leagues that the game has, and it another directory I have total classics, phase two. Perfect. Worked like a charm. However, I still have problems with phase two in how some of the players look. If you view these two pictures you will see what I mean: Image shack files http://img285.echo.cx/my.php?image=mvp2005...022208969fd.png http://img267.echo.cx/my.php?image=mvp2005...022209987av.png You see what I mean? That's pretty distorted. I am wondering if anyone has had this problem before and if you know a fix for this. Please don't bother fuzz about this because he's working on phase three for everyone. I'm just asking you guys because maybe others have had this happen. If I have to live with this (only some have this) then I guess I have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acpython1 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Now, I don't know anything about anything, but it looks to me like the game is trying to map a 2004 face (1-sided) to a 2005 skin (2-sided), so the pic gets stretched across the player's face. I've never had this problem myself, but that's what I though of when I saw that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim825 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Ok, a little update on this thing. I did this last night and it works perfect. In one directory I have the minor leagues that the game has, and it another directory I have total classics, phase two. Perfect. Worked like a charm. However, I still have problems with phase two in how some of the players look. If you view these two pictures you will see what I mean: Image shack files http://img285.echo.cx/my.php?image=mvp2005...022208969fd.png http://img267.echo.cx/my.php?image=mvp2005...022209987av.png You see what I mean? That's pretty distorted. I am wondering if anyone has had this problem before and if you know a fix for this. Please don't bother fuzz about this because he's working on phase three for everyone. I'm just asking you guys because maybe others have had this happen. If I have to live with this (only some have this) then I guess I have to. Y4L - My guess is that it may have something to do with your video card. The work I'm doing to add portraits for all classics teams is being done at lunchtime and at night on my laptop computer from work. I have the game installed on it and when I finish adding portraits for a team, I fire up the game to make sure that the portraits show up and the game doesn't crash. I see the EXACT same thing you show in your photos for some, but not all, of the faces. On my laptop, which has an ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 video card, Graig Nettles looks exactly the same as in your pictures. If, however, I fire up the game with Total Classics on my home PC that has a Radeon 9600 Pro video card, the faces are fine. What are you running the game on and what kind of video card do you have? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnofsteel34 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 another ? if i install total classics how do i get it off my cpu if i want to go back to original game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim825 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 another ? if i install total classics how do i get it off my cpu if i want to go back to original game When Total Classics is installed, it creates a backup folder (called "backup"), which saves all of the files that it modifies (roster files, uniforms, etc.). If you want to "uninstall" Total Classics, you can just replace the modified files with those in the backup folder. If disk space is not an issue, the easiest thing to do is just to have two copies of the game, one for "normal" MVP and one for Total Classics. It's very easy to setup and it works great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mnofsteel34 Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexTony Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 we are close with the rosters if not set. '98 padres, '70 reds, and PaulW may contribute the '51 NYG and/or 50's A's team got the '64 phils from stecropper now we have the 'teams' aspect set then jim825 and i have to correspond pic/audio id's where applicable (of course create some of them still) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee4Life Posted May 24, 2005 Share Posted May 24, 2005 Y4L - My guess is that it may have something to do with your video card. The work I'm doing to add portraits for all classics teams is being done at lunchtime and at night on my laptop computer from work. I have the game installed on it and when I finish adding portraits for a team, I fire up the game to make sure that the portraits show up and the game doesn't crash. I see the EXACT same thing you show in your photos for some, but not all, of the faces. On my laptop, which has an ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 video card, Graig Nettles looks exactly the same as in your pictures. If, however, I fire up the game with Total Classics on my home PC that has a Radeon 9600 Pro video card, the faces are fine. What are you running the game on and what kind of video card do you have? Ok, let me give you the information I have: Chip Type: NVIDIA GeFORCE2 MX/MX 400 DAC TYPE: Integrated RAMDAC Memory size: 64 MB Adapter String: NVIDIA GeFORCE2 MX/MX 400 Bios Information: 3.11.01.50.23 Running a 1.4 mhz computer, 256 meg of Ram. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.