NYM Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I know how when we have to do a search before posting a thread but this doesnt help at all. I lookes up for a forum and i typed exactly what it was called. There came as 46 pages of results and i looked through the first 5 and couldnt find it at all. If its possible you admins and moderators should DELETE all old old topics. This way the search will be more pleasurable for people not stressing looking at 40+ pages. So can it be done????????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
APR Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 Do you know who wrote it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkB Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 If you use the correct criteria, the search works fine. If you don't, you get 40 pages of results. Call it your punishment for being an idiot. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 Whoa! 45 day ban for MarkB! Reap the precussion's!!! :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The H Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 MarkBTheYankee, Hey, what's with the name calling???... you're an Admin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkB Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I am? Since when? Why wasn't I informed? 8O (I'm in a good mood. Good mood = jokes. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expos4Ever Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 I am? Since when? Why wasn't I informed? 8O (I'm in a good mood. Good mood = jokes. ) The search does sometime turn up a lot of results when you only have a foggy idea of what you want to talk about. The search is not perfect. So, DO EXPECT MISTAKES. P.S. I know a joke when I see one, and the idiot comment above don't sound like a joke to me. Edit it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkB Posted April 28, 2005 Share Posted April 28, 2005 If you only have a vague idea of what you are talking about, then you should expect vague results. Garbage in, garbage out. The search engine isn't someone waiting at a PC to read your mind and show you the thread you want. It's a computer. You tell it to show you every instance of the word "and" when using the search, and it most likely will. Jeez, what ever happened to having a sense of humour? :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrett67 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 you guys spend more time and wasting more space complaining about the search feature than anything I have seen here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filthy57 Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 The search does sometime turn up a lot of results when you only have a foggy idea of what you want to talk about. The search is not perfect. So, DO EXPECT MISTAKES. P.S. I know a joke when I see one, and the idiot comment above don't sound like a joke to me. Edit it out. Do you see the smilies at the end of his post? Smilies=Joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mooseknucks Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 This thread = dead until Garret absolutely had to put his two cents in. :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrett67 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 sorry man but it seems that every time I come here, I see a post that interests me because of a problem I may have had or just being something that attracts my attention, so I go and check it out only to have it end with "use the search function" ..and you know how I found this thread? Because I was searching for something that had NOTHING to do with anything in this thread. :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stix Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I was just searching Ryan Langerhans(OF Braves you've probably never heard of because there was a thread that had some edits for him) and sure enough I had 146 thread come up. Now I found what I was looking for, but I don't think that Ryan Langerhans' name is in 146 threads. :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.