kgbaseball

On paper, they're the worst team in the league, having so many rookies. Obviously, rookies ratings are lower than players that have been in the league before. They were the biggest overachievers in the MLB by far this year, and I'm sure their ratings will go up a lot since most of them proved they could play and be good in the bigs.

I have no idea. The changes for the new models.big weren't released.

I thought I fixed those, but they're fixed for the next version.

If you're using the Plus version, yes, but a few faces will be off.

How many of you are using the Standard version? Does it work? I saw that "Edam" typed a review for it, saying that it didn't work for him, and he's the only person that's said there's been anything wrong with either version. I'm assuming they both work fine because nobody has said anything until now. I bet this clown probably is using the wrong models.big, but if there really is a problem with it, I need to get it fixed. Thanks.

Personally, I don't even think it needs text. The pictures speak for themselves, and everyone knows who Batman is.

Well, I don't mind the text, I just don't like what it says.

Too much green, and The Bat text is weird. It should either say Batman or nothing.

And you still spelled chief wrong.

Cyberfaces!

Spelled Crosby wrong ;)

Thanks, fred! I haven't tried out the unis yet, but when I do, I'll let you know how they worked. From the .fsh file, everything looked to be good. I think I'm going to use a pair of thespungo's shoes in it.

hey fred, could you make a wallpaper based off of this and just give it a more exciting background? thanks. 8x6 is the resolution.

It's case sensitive I think.. Try "Pujols".

I never thought I would like any shoe better than the Huaraches, but the Shox are my new favorite; on and off the field.

Kind of bland; not a whole lot going on in it. Plus the b in LeBron should be capitalized.

I just finished all career stats. I went through all players in my roster, but I'm sure I missed a few. Another thing I noticed, and I don't know if it's my version of the Lahman database or what, but players that were on Milwaukee, Baltimore, or Washington/Montreal's roster in the past showed up as "OAK" in MVPEdit. I changed most of them to reflect the correct team, but again, I'm sure I missed some. If anybody notices anything when I have my next roster version available, let me know. This will be included with all the other updates for my roster.

True, but a lot of them are in low A and aren't in my roster. There's about 200 major league free agents, making for about 900 total free agents, or about 28% of the roster. A lot of those minor league FAs are just journeyman or organizational players, but the target of the salary changes is to get most of the players which are tied to team for the 6 year period before they can become minor league free agents. It can;t and won't be perfect, but it will be a lot more realistic.

Yeah, me and Winnie are working on it together. It's just in the beginning stages, but it'll get done.

Well, if it leads to more people using my roster, it's worth the boring-ness. You use standard or plus? I'll do that roster first.

Oh, you mean just with the Lahman database? I guess I could do that.

Tony3 will be tackling that once he's done with UR.

That, my friend, is solid. Adding a white or green glow to the cutout would get rid of the tiny cropping problem around the shoulders. Nice job.

Good news. I just finished updating all the affiliation changes for the next release. Version 2.0 will be a huge update, and will also come with new uniforms for the prospect teams, along with a completely revamped contract system that is aimed at making player's contracts as realistic as possible, as well as making the signing of free agents and players in the minor leagues easier and more realistic.

Yup. I actually had a look at what Soriano has been doing for MLB ratings today. It looks good!