Jump to content

Cavicchi

Member
  • Posts

    1009
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cavicchi

  1. I happened to check in today and read a message from Kyle asking permission to use some of my old audio. Wow, I didn't know you guys were working on an MVP 12. I haven't played MVP since MVP 08. Oh, someone asked about Pirate. I saw one of his posts on operation sports, so I guess he hangs around there now.

    Anyway, as I told Kyle, as long as credit is given, yes.

  2. On the bottom Left it says address not found?

    It has been a long time since I installed MVP Editor, thought it was as I said above. By the way, I should make a correction in that you can be in either dynasty or owner mode to run the game.

    Try installing it to where you have the MVP2005.exe file.

  3. Yes I did not see anywhere where it describes how to set it up . Where I am supposed to put the folders on my cpu etc. Can u cut and paste any info on this here for me? Thanks a ton!

    I created a folder named MVP Editor in My Documents (Documents in Vista) and installed it there, then you can make a shortcut on your desktop.

  4. As far as I'm concerned, MVP Baseball is the only game for PC and continues to be tops because of all the modders who make this game fresh and exciting every year. It truly is amazing that we can play this game with new rosters, portraits, faces, etc., and all because of the wonderful people who make it possible. My appreciation also goes to this site and eamods.com for making it all happen.

     

    As long as I can lift a gamepad, I will be playing MVP Baseball.

  5. I have to agree that this makes no sense, and I looked at the splits on baseball ref, just to make sense of it. Other than Arod having a few less doubles between 05 and 07, then hes been a better power hitter all around and theres no reason why he does not have a 100 pwr rating.

    I dig the rosters but there are many inconsistencies in it. Like ramon castro with 78 power? what lol

    O wells just gota fix it ourselves. Plus developer ratings are always by far worse in baseball games.

    I don't know about 100 for him, but he should be higher using the same criteria for Dunn & Howard. It may be a matter of lowering Hafner's rating rather than increasing A-Rod...

  6. Slugging % 2005-07:

    Dunn: 540, 490, 554

    Howard: 567, 659, 584

    Case closed.

    Thanks for the explanation. 2005-2007 3-year splits for A-Rod and Hafner against righties:

    A-Rod-- 109 homers and .604 Slugging percentage.

    Hafner--68 homers and .578 Slugging percentage.

    Both have Power rating of 91 against righties. Shouldn't A-Rod have a higher power rating than Hafner?

  7. Getting back to the purpose of this thread, questions and comments :)

    Ryan Howard hit 7 homers (against righties) more than Adam Dunn during 2005-2007 and the difference of power rating is 8 points: Howard has 100 and Dunn has 92 (against righties). I don't see why Howard should be that much higher than Dunn--7 homers over 3 years does not seem like a significant factor to me.

  8. I don't need to discuss anything with KG. I'm fine with his explanations. I know how much work and in-depth research he puts into his rosters as a part-time hobby.

    You are the one that can't seem to figure anything out for yourself.

    What a joke. I will leave this useless conversation and let others judge for themselves.

  9. Now it's your turn to listen up dolt. KG said the following a few pages ago:

    "Gee, Cavicchi, I can't get anything past you!

    But wait a minute, my 2008 ratings are based off the 3 year splits from 05-07, in which Taveras batted .300 against RHP!"

    So, if contact is not based on batting average--you need to discuss that issue with KG. :roll:

  10. you want me to explain it again for you so that you can completely miss it again? the explanation wasn't beyond understanding. but for some reason, you're not getting it. so either read it again and hope you actually pick up what they're trying to say, or just forget about it because you've made your point already.

    Why don't you address my points instead of this evasive argument? Let's stick to the facts and cut out the fat.

  11. i stand by my statement. again, you continue to show that you're completely missing the point of what they're saying. i've read it all. believe me. they say one thing, and you argue back against another. makes no sense. can't discuss things if you're speaking different languages.

    Maybe it's because the explanation for Fukudome is beyond understanding. Simple question: How is it Fukudome is rated 86 for contact against righties?

    Facts:

    1. This season is almost over and he's hitting .259 against righties.

    2. He has no stats for majors except this year.

    3. He has already been questioned in Chicago for his presence in the lineup.

    4. So far, Fukudome has been a bomb.

    Just my opinion: He is 31 years old and not a young prospect--which also makes me consider him Average instead of Lots. They already have questioned his presence in the lineup by fans in Chicago:

    http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/news/article.j...t=.jsp&c_id=chc

    His Fantasy Comparison is rather poor: http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/team/player.jsp?player_id=493120

    What exactly is it I don't understand???

  12. you need to read, re-read, and re-read again what these guys are posting. you're missing the point here completely.

    I do not agree. Read what I wrote to what HL replied. How did I use the term 3-year splits? Why did I use that term?

    What have I said about Fukudome?

  13. What's false??? I said 3-year splits and that's false???

    Fukudome does not have any splits in the majors except for this year--and this year shows him batting .259 against righties with a contact rating of 86 against righties. Ichiro has already shown us what he can do and has 3-year splits in the majors to prove it.

  14. When I asked KG why Taveras had such a high Contact rating, he said it was based on the 3-year splits--which means batting average. So, if I don't know what Contact means, or what it's based on, then KG is in the same boat with me.

    And you guys are saying batting average does not solely mean Contact--very interesting. When people argue Contact ratings, they refer to batting average. When people argue Power ratings, they refer to home runs. But, you guys say that's all wrong. Well, I am busy "adjusting" the roster so I will bow out for tonight.

  15. Contact isn't solely about batting average. Sheesh. Any time a player makes an out without striking out, that's contact.

    Contact sure is batting average. KG said that 3-year splits defined Contact for Taveras! Maybe you two guys should get together and have a discussion about Contact.

×
×
  • Create New...