wudl83

Yeah already included for the next version.

To give you a little bit information: I am still hoping that I can make a BETA version before opening day which includes all the 40-man rosters and some top prospects for every team. Today I did a good amount of preliminary work since all teams confirmed their projected depth charts at mlb.com yesterday. So I edited all lineups and 25-man rosters of the already finished teams (took about 20 minutes for every team; had hoped that I could finish it quicker, but no chance lol). Besides that I finished the ratings and top prospects of the Indians, Royals, Astros and Athletics (didn't touch contracts and service time). This means the missing players of 9 teams of the 40-man rosters + top prospects are still to do.

The problem is that I do not know who uses which faces. There have been Cyberfaces for Trout, Dickey, Darvish, Cespedes, ... before Twnlove released his versions and they got different (IMO more logical) numbers (which match the portrait IDs of those players). I won't be able to change the numbers in a way that they match for everyone.

Finished the Reds and White Sox. Update including the usual lineup changes and transactions will go online within a few minutes.

I used the list here: http://www.mvpmods.com/index.php?showtopic=52994 I didn't control every face. Maybe some do not fit. But if you tell me which faces are off I gonna change them. But please do state that in my thread. Makes it easier.

Got the Orioles and Twins today. Reds and White Sox up next.

This power mod is amazing.

Yap I see it in this way, too.

:good:

Yeah maybe but it was open long enough. Besides that it is stated in the comments below my download. And as I said it was not meant as an offense. But when you read the same question all the time...you got to know that some guys are also PMing me asking this question. :D

I plan to include the schedule and the switch of the Astros. But if there are any major problems occurring I won't do it because then it would not be worth it. Besides that I have stated this a minimum of 5 times until now. Sorry but I will not answer this question again. I have stated this multiple times and the plans have not changed. It seems that most people are only interested in the new schedule. But when they have the schedule and they get crashes they start crying and blame the roster guys. And yeah, I know that this will happen. So please do not ask me this question again. It is not meant as an offense but it becomes annoying. This was one cause why I first didn't want to open a new thread. The same questions all the time...

Thanks. Could you tell me how some top prospects have grown ratingwise? I did not have the time to test it by myself by now. If you do not remember, no problem either.

Hey guys. Since my old thread got closed I finally decided to start a new one to keep you informed on how the work goes on. As you know last year I worked together with some guys to create formulas to calculate ratings which reflect reality better compared to the original 2k ratings which in most cases are flawed. I am currently releasing a new Beta every 2-3 days. If you have any questions or tips feel free to ask or inform me. I hope I can finish the 40-Man Rosters and top prospects for all teams before the start of the regular season. _____________________________________________________________________________ Done (last update: 03/21/13): all players who are on MLB teams are accurate regarding positions, ratings, tendencies and pitches created and edited the missing players who are on the 40-Man Roster of the Orioles, Twins, Phillies, Cards, Tigers, Cubs, Dodgers, Mets, Red Sox, Braves, Giants, Rangers, Mariners, Angels and Yankees created and edited some top prospects of those teams all players of the teams that have complete 40-Man Rosters have gotten contract and service time (+ rookie-eligibilty) edits teams updated: 15/30 Up next: create and edit the missing players who are on the 40-Man Roster of the Reds and White Sox create some prospects of those teams edit the contracts and service time of those teams _____________________________________________________________________________ Link to the current version: http://www.mvpmods.c...s&showfile=7672

Really epic!

One last time: I never said all your work was stolen. Never. Ever. If I did you should prove it. Otherwise it simply is badmouthing me as a member of this community. I marked the pieces which were copied from the calculator and nothing else in the screenshots. And you knew that my calculator was not for public. Otherwise it simply would have been released in the download section. So please stop talking about this topic, especially when you do not tell the truth. At least in my thread. It gets annoying. I had to make this clear one last time. And now I hope this is put to an end. Work on your roster, I will work on mine. Everything's fine.

Download my roster. He got a 67. Use my calculator and calculate his fielding ratings and he gets a 67 range. Why are you starting to lie? Everyone can see that you are writing down the obvious untruth. Of course you copied the ratings from the calculator into your roster the screenshots prove it. That is more than obvious. Or do you really want to persist in saying that the batting and pitching ratings in your rosters for the Angels and Astros are the same like the one my calculator produces by accident? Since you are even starting to insult me I gonna talk to some moderators about that. Now it is enough. ______________________________________________ For those not interested in immature behavior but interested in my roster I have updated the roster and uploaded a new version with the 40 man rosters and top prospects of the Braves and Red Sox.

I marked the things you copied in the screenshots. And Carlos Pena has a 67 range in my roster and not 80. No idea what you are talking about. Stop talking to me. First you copy my work (this damn calculator needed ONE MONTH of work!) without asking or giving credit, then you badmouth me and now you are lying. I won't talk about it anymore. I do my work and you do yours. But when I find something like that again I will people let it know. Simple like that.

Because this is not how it works. Simple as that. This issue is done for me. I won't talk about it anymore.